Record details
A Sheffield man who bit a 13-year-old girl in intimate areas, before going on to send her messages in which he effectively âasked her to have sex with himâ is beginning a prison sentence today.Â
Geoffrey Hurt claimed he had entered into a âplay fightâ with the girl, and denied ever sending her messages; but jurors rejected his account when they found him guilty of three sex offences at the conclusion of a Sheffield Crown Court trial.Â
Sending him to prison today (June 6, 2024), Judge David Dixon told 38-year-old Hurt: âA man who is interested in biting young girls in a sexual way, as the jury found you had, is clearly a worry.â
He added: âThe jury accepted it wasnât a play fight.â
The court heard how during the course of the incident, Hurt, of Batemoor Place, Batemoor, Sheffield, bit the girl on two different intimate areas of her body.
Judge Dixon said it was âdifficult to understandâ what âkinkâ and âfetishâ Hurt had.
He continued: âAfter being involved in sexual biting, you then sent messages that were beyond flirtatious, they were simply inappropriate.Â
âYou were asking if she could send photos, and therefore you were soliciting images,â continued Judge Dixon.Â
Judge Dixon also detailed how Hurt sent her a message, which further proved his âattractionâ to one of the intimate areas he had bitten, before branding her a âteaseâ.Â
âYou asked her if she would ever go with an older manâŚwhile you said you didnât mean you, you clearly did. You had a sexual interest in her, thatâs what this has all been about.â
âThose messages, those inappropriate sexual remarks, you were in effect asking her to have sex with you. While thatâs not what was explicitly said, thatâs clearly the implication you were putting forward.âÂ
Judge Dixon said Hurt had sought to blame others and claimed the allegations had arisen out of âfabricationsâ.Â
Hurt also claimed not to have visited web links with sexual activity involving children, the court heard.
âGiven the timing of some of those activities, on your own account of what happened that simply couldnât be true.Â
âItâs you that searched those materials, itâs you that has the sexual interest in children.â
The complainant, who cannot be named for legal reasons, chose not to submit a victim personal statement to the court, prosecutor, Andrew Petterson, told the court.Â
Jurors convicted Hurt of two counts of an offender aged 18 or over engaging in non penetrative sexual activity with girl aged 13 to 15, and one count of engaging in sexual communication with a child.Â
Hurt was also accused of allegations relating to a second girl, but jurors acquitted him of the sexual offences he faced in relation to her.Â
Judge Dixon noted Hunt has a previous conviction for sexual assault dating back 12 years, which he said he regarded as an aggravating factor.Â
Defending, Camille Morland said Hurt accepts that he âcrossed some boundariesâ in relation to the complainant.
Ms Morland continued: âHeâs someone whoâs had somewhat of a complex background. He was in the army very early, and heâs somebody who has crossed boundaries before with his previous conviction for sexual assault on an adult female.â
Suggesting Hurt would âbenefitâ from being kept in the community, instead of a custodial sentence, Ms Morland continued: âHeâs someone who would benefit from rehabilitation work to tackle why he has crossed these boundaries.â
Ms Morland told the court that Hurt is in a relationship with a woman, without children, who resides in Hampshire, and his intention is to join her there.Â
Sending Hurt to begin a 18-month prison sentence, Judge Dixon told him: âYou have an unhealthy interest in young girls.âÂ
Judge Dixon said that Hurtâs continued denials, in addition to his âlies to the jury,â had led him to believe Hurt does not have a realistic prospect of rehabilitation.Â
He said that, coupled with the seriousness of his offending, meant that only a custodial sentence could be justified.Â
Hurt was also made the subject of a 10-year sexual harm prevention order, a condition of which prohibits contact with girls under the age of 18. He was also told he must register as a sex offender.Â
Judge Dixon also granted restraining orders, which prohibit him from contacting both accusers for a period of 10 years. Â