We rely on ads to support our work.
Please whitelist us or consider donating ❤️
Browse publicly available information collected from news reports and other public sources.
Ernesto Ceraldi 48
Greater Manchester Police dog handler jailed for 'horrific' sex attack.
Greater Manchester Police dog handler jailed for 'horrific' sex attack.
No fixed address.
Horse molester OAP admits sex assault on teen at McDonalds.
Kincardine Road, Crieff, Perthshire, PH7
Daniel Abraham 39
Teaching assistant preyed on young child and sexually assaulted her at school.
Teaching assistant preyed on young child and sexually assaulted her at school.
Lawrence Street, Gillingham, Kent, ME7
Shabir Ahmed 73
Paedophile worked as a welfare officer in Oldham unchecked for a year – despite being accused of serious child sexual abuse.
Paedophile worked as a welfare officer in Oldham unchecked for a year – despite being accused of serious child sexual abuse.
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Later sexual abuse by notorious Rochdale grooming gang leader and paedophile Shabir Ahmed could have been prevented if earlier offending behaviour and the threat he posed to children had been properly addressed, a damning report has found.
Almost three years after being commissioned, a review into allegations of historic child sexual exploitation has found that children in Oldham were being exploited and let down by services which tried and failed to protect them.
The review, commissioned by Oldham Council in 2019 and written by experts Malcolm Newsam and Gary Ridgway, looked at the way authorities have dealt with child sexual exploitation in Oldham between 2011 and 2014, and one specific case dating back to 2005.
Among its damning findings, the review has uncovered that Shabir Ahmed worked as a welfare officer in Oldham unchecked for a year despite being accused of serious child sexual abuse.
Ahmeds links to Oldham and the council had been investigated as part of the review, which has uncovered serious failures in how authorities dealt with the predator.
The report has found that there was a significant allegation of child sexual abuse made to police in 2005 against Ahmed whilst he was working at Oldham Council.
This occurred three years before he was arrested in relation to the widespread grooming and gang rape in Rochdale, which also saw abused girls let down by police and social services.
Known as Daddy by his victims, he was found guilty of two rapes, aiding and abetting rape, sexual assault and trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation and was sentenced to 19 years imprisonment.
In June 2012 he was found guilty of a further 30 rape charges and was jailed for an additional 22 years, adding three years to his overall prison term.
Ahmed, now 69, worked at Oldham Council between 1988 and 2006, and was employed as a welfare rights officer seconded to the Oldham Pakistani Community Centre.
This role would have meant he would potentially have had contact with a range of vulnerable adults and their children.
The review team state they believe there were serious failings in how both the council and Greater Manchester Police investigated concerns in respect of Ahmed while allegations of child sexual assault were being levelled at him during his employment as a welfare officer.
The full details of his case have not been made public due to concerns about jigsaw identification of his victims.
However a summary of the case included within the report finds that as early as 2005, GMP was notified of a serious allegation of child sexual abuse perpetrated by Ahmed.
The victim, now an adult, also alerted police that Ahmed had also potentially had contact with a young child who lived outside of Oldham.
A crime report was not submitted on the back of this information which GMP said was in line with its working practices at the time. However, the review team says the National Crime Recording Standard in place at the time required a crime to be recorded.
GMP also failed to inform the local authority responsible for the child, and also did not notify Oldham Council which was then Ahmeds employer.
As a result of the disclosure that he potentially presented a serious risk to children, Newsam and Ridgway say a full assessment should have been undertaken to assess the risks he posed to any other children he may have come into contact with.
But instead insufficient enquiries were made into whether his role gave him access to vulnerable adults and children.
If this had happened it may have potentially avoided the tragic abuse of other children, the report states.
In February 2008, Ahmed was arrested for sexual assault on a child, and that July was also arrested on suspicion of abducting two other children.
However the review states that neither of the two children made a complaint, and consequently no crime was recorded and no further action taken.
When queried by the review team, Oldham Council was unable to find any record of being notified of these allegations by Greater Manchester Police.
And there is no evidence that GMP had notified the council about the allegations, so that it could investigate the risks he may have posed to children he could have been involved with through his job.
Oldham Council were also not involved in subsequent strategy discussions between GMP and Rochdale Council about Ahmed, and both the 2008 and 2005 allegations.
Even after Ahmed was charged with sexual assault at the end of September 2008, no action was taken by Oldham council to undertake a safeguarding assessment, or liaise with the police force.
He would not be jailed for his prolific sexual offending until 2012.
In 2011 he was charged with the rape of the child in 2005, and remanded in custody.
Oldham Council was notified by the probation service, and given the profound child sexual abuse, this shouldve been a further opportunity to initiate a full assessment of [Ahmeds] circumstances but there is no evidence of this having occurred.
GMP requested copies of files about Ahmed and his family, which informed Oldham Council about the child that lived outside of the borough that could have potentially been put at risk.
This significant information should have prompted the authority to begin a multi-agency strategy discussion to assess the threats presented to any other children. However the review states that the council has never been able to locate any record to explain why this never occurred.
The following year another young woman bravely revealed she had also been abused by Ahmed, and GMP notified Oldham Council of the allegations.
The abuse occurred while he was employed as a welfare rights officer, but it is not known whether he had been involved with her family in a professional capacity.
However the report states that childrens social care inexplicably closed the case within a few days without undertaking any assessment.
The authority has been unable to locate anything further on this child and the review finds there is no evidence of an assessment of her allegations or her vulnerability.
The review team have been informed that the case was discontinued by Greater Manchester Police on the basis that there was no realistic prospect of conviction, the report states.
Neither Greater Manchester Police nor Oldham council was able to provide the review team with any assurance that the childs allegations and vulnerability were appropriately dealt with.
The review team conclude that there were serious multiple failures by both Greater Manchester Police and Oldham council to follow the procedures in place to investigate the threat [Ahmed] presented to children.
If these procedures had been followed, his offending behaviour could have been addressed at an earlier stage and potentially the abuse of his subsequent victims may have been prevented.
Further findings
The review also finds that a number of working Oldham taxi drivers had been accused of rape or sexual offences against children but kept their licences.
Two drivers who were alleged to have assaulted girls should have had their licences revoked by the council, and several known offenders had been granted or had their taxi licences renewed by councillors.
Following the Rotherham scandal, in 2014 Oldham council reviewed all the cases where licence holders had been accused of sexual offences.
There were originally five drivers identified who had serious criminal convictions, but only one of these was taken to the licensing panel and had his licence revoked.
One of the remaining four went on to commit a sexual assault on a young female passenger in 2015. He had been convicted of an indecent assault on a woman in a shopping centre, and received a conditional discharge.
He was convicted in 2017 of the later assault, and the judge in the case queried why a licence had been granted given his previous conviction, which triggered a formal complaint to the council.
Following this the councils chief executive Carolyn Wilkins ordered officers to undertake a review of all licensed drivers, which were around 1,300 people.
The report listed nine drivers, where one had been convicted of offences against children.
Of these nine, six licences were revoked or ended.
One driver had been questioned by police in relation to two separate alleged sexual assaults, three years apart, on two young female passengers.
There were also concerning details of the offence by another driver. It was alleged that a victim was a customer who had been sexually assaulted in his taxi and subsequently raped.
The Crown Prosecution Service had taken no further action, but this was the only detail that was supplied to the licensing panel.
He raised the matter formally with the-then chief constable of GMP, Ian Hopkins, in 2018 but did not get a response.
GMP has now confirmed it has commissioned a review of the content, application, and senior ownership of the forces policies on disclosure around taxi drivers.
Cover up?
Large portions of the report are dedicated to establishing whether authorities, the police, council and political leaders, covered up the activity of grooming gangs in the borough.
The review team conclude they find no evidence of a widespread cover up of sexual exploitation, and the review finds no evidence that senior managers or councillors sought to cover up the potential exploitation of children by local taxi services.
And the team were provided with no evidence, either through interviews or documentary review, to suggest that there was widespread exploitation of children in residential settings in Oldham.
An official statement released by GMP stated that they only had two pieces of intelligence about potential CSE, and neither of these were substantiated.
This was based on the response of a police sergeant who was asked to provide information in relation to the media enquiry.
The review team says that there was no doubt that during this same period there were legitimate concerns by the council and police that high-profile convictions of predominantly Pakistani offenders could be capitalised on by a far-right agenda and lead to the victimisation of the Pakistani community.
However it is clear from all the evidence we have seen that the council and its partners in no way avoided addressing this, and in fact saw successful disruption and prosecution as the route to winning the confidence of all communities in Oldham, they write.
There is significant evidence that the council did everything possible to publicise the threat of child sexual exploitation.
Reports went to council committees, bi-annual meetings were held with the leader, chief executive, cabinet members and the opposition leader to discuss safeguarding issues, and the council introduced a training module on CSE for councillors to attend.
This included the roll-out of performances of a play, Somebodys Sister, Somebodys Daughter, about sexual exploitation which was shown to more than 3,000 Oldham pupils across all the boroughs schools.
Then-council leader Jim McMahon wrote on his blog in 2014 that anyone who shies away from accepting that in Rotherham, Oxford, Rochdale, and here in Oldham and that this particular form of abuse is predominantly Pakistani men targeting white girls is not helping the victims and nor is it helping the Asian community at large.
He said that despite court cases being jumped on by far-right campaigners that was in fact more of a reason to act.
If we dont tackle wrongdoing, we give more oxygen to those who seek to gain politically by accusing those in authority of cover-ups and failures, he wrote.
The review team say they believe this clearly refutes suggestion that Mr McMahon was intending to protect perpetrators from the Pakistani community, but rather wanted to tackle it head on.
What the authorities say
In response to the report, Greater Manchester leaders have apologised for the failings by both police and child protection services.
Oldham council leader Amanda Chadderton said: We fully accept the findings of this independent report.
It highlights clear failings, where our services at the time were not good enough to protect vulnerable young people suffering the most awful abuse. For that I am deeply sorry.
I can never fully understand what those girls went through, and I also know that an apology now will never make up for what has happened in the past.
I do hope, however, to offer some reassurance that, as a council, we havent stood still since the time period the review refers to.
We have learned from reports carried out in other towns and cities across the country, and from changes in national guidance, and have changed the way we do things as a result.
The way we work has already moved on immeasurably.
That said, we are not complacent. We can and will improve further, wherever we need to.
Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Stephen Watson said: The safeguarding arrangements that were in place in GMP during the time period covered by the review were not good enough to protect children from sexual abuse.
I want to offer my sincere apologies to everyone affected by the events considered in the report. Our actions fell far short of the help that they had every right to expect and were unacceptable.
I am sorry for the hurt and on-going trauma they have suffered because of what happened to them.
Sex offender jailed for breaching court order.
Mayfield Road, Northwich, Cheshire, CW9
Stephen Jennings 43
Paedophile left little girl with 'night terrors' of man in room.
Paedophile left little girl with 'night terrors' of man in room.
The Glen, Palacefields, Runcorn, WA7
A paedophile left his young victim suffering night terrors of a man at the end of her bed after she was sexually assaulted twice.
Stephen Jennings, 39, of The Glen, Runcorn, appeared at Chester Crown Court on Friday for sentence after three guilty pleas to possessing indecent images and conviction at trial over the two assaults.
Philip Clemo, prosecuting, said Jennings initially groped his victim over clothes.
When she asked him to stop, he refused and assaulted her again. The abuse came to light when the childs mother heard her using inappropriate language, and she then said what had happened.
It was reported to the victims school. In voluntary interview with Cheshire Police, Jennings denied what took place and any sexual interest in children.
That lie was left in tatters when a search of his two phones revealed 10 Category A abuse images - the most serious type and including one of a girl of about 10 years of age in distress being raped, 10 Category B and 178 Category C.
The court heard that at trial an adult witness gave evidence that while having sex with Jennings, he had called her my good little 12-year-old girl and she told him dont say that.
An impact statement from his young victims mother said the little girl suffered psychological symptoms of abuse including night terrors worrying about a man being at the end of the bed.
Mr Clemo said features of the case showing higher levels of harm included the girls extreme youth and her vulnerability.
Jennings had no previous convictions and most recently lived with his parents on The Glen, Runcorn..
Gareth Bellis, defending, pleaded mitigation for the indecent image guilty pleas and urged the judge to consider the principle of totality when considering the overall sentence, with some aggravating features subsumed by others to avoid double counting.
He added a probation report assessed Jennings as a low risk of reoffending and was not suitable for the dangerousness provisions such as an extended sentence.
Mr Bellis said Jennings was hitherto a man of good character who had worked for 20 years.
Recorder Mark Ford sentenced Jennings to four years in prison, and placed him on a Sexual Harm Prevention Order and the sex offenders register, both for life or until further notice.
Sending Jennings down, Recorder Ford said: It was clear to me from her evidence that she didnt want you to touch her in this way and that her complaints to you didnt prevent you from continuing.
Despite the clarity with which (your victim) expressed herself, despite her young age, you maintained your denial of the conduct as was your right but the explanations you set out to provide rather unravelled during cross examination and the jury duly convicted you.
Sexual assault and rape of a woman.
Fyning Street, Portsmouth, PO1
Jack McRae 33
Raping a woman in her own home and then keeping her prisoner for several days.
Raping a woman in her own home and then keeping her prisoner for several days.
Golden Grove, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14
Possessing more than 47,000 indecent images of children.
Shirley Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO15
Convicted of a string of child sex offences.
Camborne Close, Bishopstoke, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO50
Sexual assault and assault by beating and kidnap.
No fixed address.
He attacked at woman at Newport bus station, Isle of Wight, and dragged her towards Church Litten Park.
The woman fought back and managed to get away.
Following his release from prison, Willett had to stay at an approved premises in Waterlooville.
He is also required to inform police of any change of address within three days, including if he had no fixed abode, and to register any online usernames with Hampshire Constabulary.
This is part of Willetts sex offender notification requirements.
On June 5, he absconded from his approved premises, and police found he had created online usernames which he had not registered.
Police issued an appeal to the public for help in finding Willett on Wednesday.
The sex offenderwas arrested on the Isle of Wight on the same day.
Willett was charged yesterday with two counts of breaching his sex offender notification requirements.
The 23-year-old was also recalled to prison for breaching his licence conditions, and will serve the remainder of his previous sentence.
He admitted the notification requirement breaches at Isle of Wight Magistrates Court.
Willett was handed an additional eight-month prison term, and had to pay 85 in costs, and a 128 victim surcharge
Acting Detective Inspector Mark Edis said Willett was arrested within hours of publishing the wanted appeal.
He added: We are very grateful to the local community who supported our efforts to locate Willett after he absconded.
Licence conditions and notification requirements are legally binding, and are put in place to protect the public by ensuring individuals do not re-offend.
There are of course those individuals, like Willett, who show absolute disregard for this.
We invest significant resources into the management of sex offenders and the protection of the public, and take this duty very seriously.
We hope that the swift action taken by police reassures the community of this, and that we will make every to put those who still choose to offend right back where they belong in prison.
Christopher Seston 53
Sex offender who abused a child snared after uploading indecent pictures of children online.
Sex offender who abused a child snared after uploading indecent pictures of children online.
Sandhurst, Berkshire, GU47
A Sandhurst man uploaded indecent images of a child onto the Internet and even engaged in sexual activity with a minor. Police became alerted to Christopher Seston's sordid act when email addresses he was connected to uploaded images.
Police officers in Wiltshire, where the 49-year-old used to live, became aware of the uploads last year. Seston was arrested and his devices seized.
It was then the true extent of his offending was uncovered. Evidence suggested Seston had not only uploaded indecent images of children online, but he had also abused a child.
Seston was arrested in February last year. He has now pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual activity with a child and four counts of taking indecent images of a child.
Seston appeared before Salisbury Crown Court where he was jailed for four years. He has also been made subject to an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order.
Detective Constable Jason Walsh, from Wiltshire Polices Child Internet Exploitation Team, said: This was a disturbing case where our initial enquiries into the uploading of indecent images of children led to us uncovering the fact that Seston had also been sexual abusing a child. I would like to pay tribute to the young victim in this case who has had the courage to bravely speak out about what happened to her and whose evidence has led to Seston being convicted and sentenced for his offending.
We would like to encourage anyone who has been the victim of sexual offences to feel that they can speak to someone. You will be believed and we can ensure the relevant support is put in place, particularly when children or young people are involved.
David Wilkinson 47
Posed as a GP to convince a 13-year-old girl to meet him after an online sex chat.
Posed as a GP to convince a 13-year-old girl to meet him after an online sex chat.
Jubilee Road, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24
Colin Eamens 70
Sex offender lured young boys to his home with the promise of sweets and fizzy.
Sex offender lured young boys to his home with the promise of sweets and fizzy.
Nelson Street, Shotton, Deeside, Flintshire, CH5
A "depraved" sex offender lured young boys to his home with the promise of sweets and fizzy before "taking away their innocence". Colin Eamens, 66, of Nelson Street in Shotton, Flintshire's carried out a campaign of abuse that spanned five decades. while posing a respectable member of the community.
Eamens, 66, admitted to 17 counts of sexual abusing six underage teenage boys from the late 1970s and into the 2010s. He was sentenced to 17 years at Mold Crown Court on Friday.
Prosecutor, Brian Treadwell said Eamens would have children "drop in" and he would often provide them with cigarettes and alcohol, as well as sweets and fizzy drinks. The prosecutor said Eamens would "seek out items" such as computer game consoles and a Sodastream machine to "attract" children to hang out at his home.
Eamens targeted the boys from when he was in his early 20s through his mid-fifties.
He befriended the victims and their parents and had been regarded as a "family friend". Some of the children he would go on to abuse would, on occasions, spend the night at his home.
One victim said Eamens performed a sexual act upon himself in front of the boy which became "something of a habit". This progressed on to the boy having sexual acts performed upon him "on at least 30 occasions", the court was told.
Eamens later raped him one Christmas Day in the 1980s when he was just 15 years old. The abuse carried on for a further two years.
Mr Treadwell said Eamens sexually abused a further five boys over 30 years. He performed sexual acts either in front of or upon the children and on some occasions offered them "cash for sexual favours", the court heard.
Duncan Bould, defending, said Eamens was "very open" when confessing to his actions and is aware that a "significant" prison term awaited him.
Judge Rhys Rowlands jailed Eamens for a total of 17 years for his "disturbing" offences. He praised their "courage" in coming forward.
He said: "It is plain that as a younger man you were prone to behaving in a thoroughly depraved fashion, targeting and subjecting young teenage boys to various forms of sexual abuse. There are six victims, each of whom were young when they were abused by you.
"They had to live with what you did to them while you moved on living your life as though nothing had happened, moving from one victim to another. As youngsters they shouldn't have had a care in the world, but instead you were taking away their innocence and in some respects their childhood."
Speaking after the sentencing, DI Iolo Edwards, said: This has been a protracted and extensive investigation of Eamens activities and we welcome todays sentence. We hope that this sentence brings some closure for the victims who have supported our investigation from its outset."
DI Edwards went on to say that any person affected by sexual violence can seek support anonymously from the North Wales Sexual Assault Referral Centre. They can be reached by calling 0808 1563658.
Snared by paedophile hunters handed prison sentence.
Woking, Surrey
A man who lived in Woking has been jailed for child sex offences after he was snared by paedophile hunters. Asad Ullah, 28, was sentenced to three years and nine months at Guildford Crown Court on Wednesday, June 15 after admitting his crimes.
Ullah, of no fixed address, had been speaking to who he thought were young girls online in a sexually explicit manner. He had planned to meet one of them on November 10 last year.
But Ullah had actually been speaking to adult members of the public who had posed as children in order to identify paedophiles online. It was the same members of the public who met Ullah at Woking Leisure Centre when he was arrested by officers.
Ullah was charged with the offences in January this year when he was remanded to prison to await sentencing. In addition to his prison sentence, he was also given a lifetime sexual harm prevention order and will be on the sex offenders' register for life.
Investigating officer Dave Evans, who works in Surrey Police's paedophile online investigation team, said: Ullah displayed dangerous, predatory behaviour towards young girls. It is a relief that he is in prison where he can't continue to pose a threat to children.
"I know that this is an emotive subject for members of the public, and rightly so, but I would like to take this opportunity to urge people not to take matters into their own hands and to report any allegations straight to us so that we can carry out a full investigation." The force is also asking social media users to consider the impact on the judicial process before sharing anything online which could harm future court proceedings.