Brandon Maloney 25

Description

A paedophile from Cheshire shared sickening images of children online and said he 'couldn't be trusted' if he had a child.

Police executed a warrant at the home of Brandon Maloney, 23, of Castle View House, Runcorn, on January 25 but he wasn’t there. Frances Willmott, prosecuting at Chester Crown Court on Tuesday, said Maloney returned later and made contact with officers, the Liverpool Echo reports.

He volunteered an additional phone and made admissions about indecent images of children. Ms Willmott said the two phones contained 55 child abuse images with victims’ ages ranging from three years and up.

More than half, 29, were of the worst type in Category A including 13 videos, 25 were in Category B, and one was in Category C.

The court heard brief details of some of the horrific imagery on the phones, namely of young boys being raped by adults. Maloney also had an “extreme pornographic” clip of a woman and a dog.

The download activity spanned from November 2017 until his arrest in January 2022. Officers from Cheshire Police also discovered Malony had engaged in sick chats with another paedophile online and shared abuse images during those exchanges, which took place between December 5 and 26, 2021.

In one message Maloney said “he couldn’t be trusted if he had a child that was a boy”.

Four of the shared images were Category A, three were B and two were in C, with the ages of victims involved described as “nearer the three to five” age range by Judge Simon Berkson.

Maloney pleaded guilty at the first opportunity to one count of possessing indecent images of children, three of making indecent images, three of distributing an indecent photograph of a child, and one of possessing extreme pornography.

He had no previous convictions and two cautions for dissimilar matters. Louise McCloskey, defending, pleaded mitigation for Maloney’s prompt guilty pleas, his cooperation with the police investigation, relative youth and “immaturity”, and said he has been diagnosed as having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and might have undiagnosed autism as believed by his mother.

She said Maloney had suffered depression and tried to deal with those issues through alcohol and illicit drugs.
Ms McCloskey said the distribution offences related to a private one-to-one exchange as opposed to commercial or larger scale distribution.

She conceded that: “It’s only right that any right-minded member of society would call for an immediate custodial sentence in cases of this kind - Your Honour has quite rightly pointed out the serious aggravating features, mainly the depiction of very young children in very distressing circumstances.”

The defence barrister said Maloney had been “extremely frank” about “accepting full responsibility” in his interview with the probation service, and had sought help from the Lucy Faithfull Foundation.

Maloney’s pre-sentence report (PSR) covered some of the “challenging situations he’s encountered in his life, which may well have impacted on his emotional and thought processes”.

Ms McCloskey said: “The assessment ultimately concludes with an indication that this defendant could be properly rehabilitated with a very stringent and structured intervention by the probation service.”

She said this could include a rehabilitation activity requirement and completion of the Horizon sex offender programme.

There were two references for Maloney, one of which was from his mother who accompanied him to court but was “too distressed to come into the courtroom”.

Judge Berkson referred to the sentencing guidelines and in particular the range of sentence available for the most serious offence of distributing a Category A child abuse image, which has a starting point of three years with a range of one to five, as well as the principle of “totality”.

He branded the images “revolting”, and added most aggravating features in the guidance “are almost generic” because they occur so frequently for the type of offence.

For Maloney these included the vulnerability of the victims and the moving images.

Mitigating features were Maloney’s previous “good character”, “remorse”, and “lack of maturity” with the offences beginning in 2017.

Judge Berkson granted a third discount for Maloney’s guilty pleas and jailed him for 28 months, remarking on the added seriousness of the distribution charges. He said: “More serious as regarded by the courts was your distribution of the images falling into Categories A, B and C.

“Any distribution of indecent images of the abuse of children means more and more of those images enter circulation so more people can see those images and the abuse continues and continues.“

Maloney was also placed on the sex offenders register and a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for 10 years.