Description
A family GP who kept his job despite being on the Sex Offender Register for groping a receptionist has been struck off after leaving a female patient in tears over an 'inappropriate' medical examination.
Dr Sanjay Chatterjee, 60, had previously walked free from court and escaped with a nine-month suspension from work after he twice grabbed a receptionist by the bottom and later attempted to kiss her in three separate encounters.
But he was reported to police and the General Medical Council again after he inserted a medical implement inside a woman's vagina without her consent while examining her for suspected haemorrhoids.
She was left in shock and burst into tears as she told her family about the consultation and subsequently called police to claim she had been sexually assaulted.
Inquiries revealed married father-of-two Chatterjee had ignored police restrictions on his movements under the terms of the Sex Offender Register by repeatedly flying abroad using a new passport.
At the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, Chatterjee who lives in the village of Larkfield near Aylesford, Kent, was ordered to have his name erased from the doctor's register after he was found guilty of serious professional misconduct.
A panel said his examination of the patient was 'inappropriate and not clinically indicated', but cleared him of sexually motivated conduct.
No criminal action was taken against him over the examination.
Chatterjee was initially reported to police in 2010 and charged with sexual assault after the receptionist at a clinic in Medway and a second woman made complaints about him.
The receptionist said she was working a Saturday shift at the out of hour's service clinic when Chatterjee put his hand on her right buttock while she was sitting in reception leaning forward toward her computer.
Initially the receptionist did not want to make a complaint, but later while looking for a diclofenac injection in a dispensary Chatterjee was said to have stood 'uncomfortably close behind her'.
When she turned to ask for help, she found him about 12 inches away from her face.
He started to talk about her jewellery, and grabbed her shoulders in an attempt to kiss her.
She escaped by raising her arms in a 'trained conflict resolution move.'
At Maidstone Crown Court in 2011, Chatterjee was convicted of sexually assaulting the receptionist and was given 250 hours unpaid work, ordered to pay £1,000 costs and was ordered to sign the Sex Offender Register for five years.
He was cleared of seven sex charges involving the second woman after he insisted they were having an affair.
At the time, Chatterjee's loyal wife Sumona, an NHS manager told their local newspaper said: 'He been made to look as if he's a perverse and perverted man but he isn't. He made one silly mistake and that's it.'
Chatterjee himself said: 'I betrayed my wife and family and I am quite ashamed about that - but what has been done cannot be undone.
'When she heard I had cheated on her she became angry and it was hell. The whole house was in complete shock - it was darkness.'
Chatterjee was temporarily banned from treating patients in July 2014 despite the GMC calling for him to be struck off.
By March 2015 he was allowed to work again under supervision and eventually returned to unrestricted practice.
But he was back in court again after he was caught flying to Kolkata in India and also Portugal in 2016 as he needed permission from the authorities if he wished to travel abroad and notify them of any changes to his passport.
Inquiries revealed the trips had been booked using a new passport and he was given 84 days in prison, suspended for a year, and was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.
He was also ordered to pay £200 costs for failing to comply with notification requirements.
The latest incident occurred at the Aylesford Medical Centre in May 2021 when a female patient known as Ms A was admitted for ulcerative colitis and rectal bleeding.
She said Dr Chatterjee asked her to get on the examination couch before he picked up a speculum and squeezed lubricant gel on it.
Recalling the examination Ms A said: 'He never went into detail about any of what he was going to do - he just kind of got on with it. I went a little bit tense as it was a little bit sore.
'He put it in had a look around and said: 'I can't see anything in there, maybe they're further up.'
I thought 'Oh that's it now' but in the next second he just put it straight into my vagina with no warning, no explanation, nothing.
'I was just so shocked I really didn't know how to react to it at all. He didn't explain it to me.'
A student nurse who witnessed the examination said: 'I remember Dr Chatterjee's communication was really poor.
'He didn't have an introduction with her at the start of the appointment, he didn't say hello, ask how she was, invite her to take a seat or explain what was going to happen in the appointment. He just said: 'OK get undressed.'
An expert assigned to investigate the incident later said: 'I can see no reason why a vaginal examination was clinically indicated or appropriate, given the presenting symptoms were bowel related and seemed to have nothing to do with her vagina.'
And for the GMC, Ms Jade Bucklow said: 'Patient A was left confused and feeling violated. She contacted friends and family in a distressed state and subsequently had to give evidence to the police so that they could consider whether she had been sexually assaulted.
'All of this arose from Dr Chatterjee's failure to obtain informed consent for intimate examinations and the carrying out of a vaginal examination that was inappropriate and not clinically indicated.'
Chatterjee did not attend the hearing but in a statement said he had no intention of returning to medical practice.
He added: 'I accept that I carried out the rectal examination of the patient. A chaperone was present. If there was any contact with the patient's vagina then this was unintentional.'
His counsel Martin Forde KC said: 'The doctor resumed his career with no complaints other than the single patient in this case.
'There was no repetition of any sexually motivated behaviour [from] 2011 to 2024, a period of 13 years.
'The proven charges relate to one patient and one consultation. Clearly, the Panel have found communication could have been better, but such a failure is easily remediable.'
But MPTS chairman Mr Graham White said: ' Dr Chatterjee's failure to obtain Patient A's informed consent caused her emotional harm, leaving her in shock and distress and feeling as if she had been violated.
Both Patient A's daughter and friend described her as being distressed and in tears when she discussed what had happened to her.
'The fact Dr Chatterjee's registration had previously been suspended in relation to a 2011 conviction for sexual assault against a colleague was a significant aggravating factor.
'There was no evidence that Dr Chatterjee understood the nature or gravity of his misconduct and convictions and there was no evidence of any attempts by him to address or remediate them.
'There were no expressions of regret or apology.'